Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Blackrock (USD 5.1T AUM) vs Blackstone (USD 311B AUM)
To understand the difference between BlackRock and Blackstone. Let's first understand the difference between traditional assets like fixed income/mutual funds and alternative assets like Private Equity, Real Estate Funds Model.

Generally, Traditional Asset managers buys fixed income assets like bonds, etfs which generate income periodically, though the amount can vary. They also operates mutual funds which buy shares of a publicly traded company and sell them at profit but they don't run companies and these are generally for retail investors.

Whereas, in Private Equity or Real Estate Fund, you buy a stake in the company which could be upto 100% and the company targeted are generally private limited company, though they also buy public companies as well. Now, a Private Equity fund would bring the expertise, or reshuffle the management of a company if needed to make the company profitable. Their work don not stop on just investment, the real work starts from them after buying. They run the company , make it profitable and exit when suitable.

Now, Blackrock and Blackstone both of them are asset management company but the big difference between them is their clients and their Investment Strategy.

Blackrock is mostly a traditional asset manager which mostly deals in mutual funds, ETFs, fixed income assets, risk management and etc. It caters to all types of investors ranging from retail investors to pension funds or other financial institutions which justify their huge AUM i.e. more than 4.5 trillion dollars and tagged as world's largest asset manager. It has both open ended and close ended funds and operates in highly competitive fee based models

On other hand Blackstone is purely an alternative asset manager which deals in Private Equity, Real Estate and Hedge Funds and caters to only High Net worth Individuals and Financial Institutions who can commit a large amount of money and for longer period. Blackstone doesn't cater to retail investors due to the nature of it's business. It has only close ended funds with average total life of a fund around 10 years. Blackstone AUM is around 350 billion dollars which stands it as largest alternative fund manager.

Blackstone as being a PE & RE firm works on the philosophy of "Buy it, Fix it and Sell it". They put their effort, time and resources to make a company profitable in which they have invested.

Though, there is a huge difference between the AUM of Blackrock and Blackstone but when it comes to Net Income, it is generally comparable.

Now, as competition is increasing both firms have started foray into each other business but being the dominant leader in their respective business it will be difficult for each of them compete in each other's arena.


Blackstone and BlackRock Are Getting Into Each Other’s Business, Wrote:To understand how Steve Schwarzman and Larry Fink, one-time partners who had an ugly breakup two decades ago, today compete for attention among the most pow­erful people in business and finance, con­sider the events of a few days in mid-April.

Schwarzman’s Blackstone Group, the world’s largest alternative asset manager, announced on April 10 that it would pay $14 billion for a portfolio of properties General Electric wanted to shed. The largest real es­tate transaction since the financial crisis, this deal not only cemented Blackstone’s standing as the biggest landlord on the planet. It also underscored how Blackstone’s financial clout and real estate savvy made it the buyer someone like GE’s Jeffrey Immelt would turn to in the midst of a restructuring.

Fink and BlackRock, which has become the largest traditional money management firm since being shed by Blackstone, were the ones in the news on April 14. In a letter to the heads of every company in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, Fink, 62, warned about the growing influence of activist sharehold­ers and the dangers of short-term thinking. His missive, written in the plain, direct lan­guage he’s known for, showed how Fink is a leader among global investors—and a tough man to ignore, given his firm’s $4.8 trillion.

Such days aren’t even extraordinary for these guys. Blackstone’s private equity arm owns companies that employ some 600,000 people, giving Schwarzman, 68, a unique window on the economy. One of the 10 richest Americans in the financial in­dustry and a generous Republican donor, Schwarzman has been called on to advise presidents and congressional leaders. Fink, as overseer of retirement funds for teachers, cops, firefighters, and millions of retail in­vestors, casts himself as a voice for savers. A Democrat, he has provided counsel to cen­tral bankers and heads of state, and is quick to mention these interactions in conversa­tion. Fink’s name was raised when Presi­dent Barack Obama was looking for a new U.S. Treasury Secretary in 2012.

James B. Lee Jr., in an interview for this story a few weeks before his sudden death on June 17, said his friends Schwarzman and Fink both enjoy remarkable influence due to the success of their companies. “They have fabulous platforms that create a megaphone for them,” said Lee, who was vice chairman and a legendary dealmaker at JPMorgan Chase. “That gives them consider­able voice within both business and political circles.”
Their megaphones are only getting louder as Blackstone and BlackRock gather more assets, expand into new activities, and extend the leads they enjoy over their clos­est competitors. And now, they’re getting into each other’s business.

Blackstone and BlackRock say they aren’t direct rivals. Schwarzman, when the topic is raised, says his company and Fink’s over­lap very little, though he also says change is constant in his world. “It’s a business with­out patents,” he says. “Innovation is a re­quirement.” Blackstone President Tony James says it’s always possible that Black­Rock could buy one of his direct competitors in the private equity field, though he knows of no such plans.

Fink, through a spokesman, declined to be interviewed for this article after being told it was for a rivalry-themed issue of Bloomberg Markets. Black­Rock co-founder Ralph Schlosstein, who left in 2007 and now runs the investment bank Evercore Partners, says Fink worries not at all about Blackstone: “They are in com­pletely different businesses.”

On the surface, this is true. In the decades since the breakup, BlackRock has grown by managing money for pension funds and re­tail investors. It runs the world’s largest col­lection of exchange-traded funds. It invests primarily in stocks and bonds and is almost always long-only. Blackstone, on the other hand, has become a $300 billion giant in the world of alternative assets—private equity, hedge funds, and real estate—serving insti­tutional clients almost exclusively.

Each firm has become so dominant that it essentially defines the category it inhab­its. BlackRock doubled its assets twice in the past 10 years, a remarkable feat when the numbers are in the trillions. Growth has come organically and through well-timed acquisitions. BlackRock bought Mer­rill Lynch & Co.’s fund management unit in 2006 and Barclays Global Investors in 2009, which catapulted the firm into ETFs.

Blackstone, which turns 30 this year, has trounced its closest competitors. Its $48 bil­lion market cap is roughly equal to all of its publicly traded private equity peers com­bined, including KKR, Carlyle Group, and Apollo Global Management. Margins are higher in the alternatives realm, so Black­stone’s operating profit exceeds Black­Rock’s, even though Fink’s pool of assets is an order of magnitude larger. After re­porting 2014 adjusted income of $4.3 bil­lion, about $1 billion more than BlackRock, Schwarzman boasted in a letter to investors that his firm was the world’s most profitable public asset manager.

Just because past successes have been on parallel tracks, however, doesn’t mean the search for growth isn’t forcing the firms to cross paths. Fink has been making forays into private equity, hedge funds, and real estate. In 2009, BlackRock hired Matthew Botein to be co-head of this alternatives busi­ness, which now manages $113 billion. Bo­tein once worked for Blackstone. Both firms eye the huge opportunity in serving individ­ual investors who, in the U.S. alone, control some $14 trillion in retirement savings. In the past two years, Blackstone has launched two mutual funds, which invest in hedge funds and have collected $3 billion in assets. The firm is also offering private equity and real estate funds for wealthy retail investors and has created publicly traded credit funds.

“You’re seeing the traditional and alter­native managers bump into each other,” says Rob Lee, an analyst at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods who follows Blackstone and BlackRock.

Once upon a time, of course, Schwarzman and Fink and all of their employees were to­gether in one office at 345 Park Ave. in New York. The shared history of Blackstone and BlackRock is the stuff of Wall Street leg­end. Schwarzman and Peter G. Peterson, former colleagues at Lehman Brothers, founded Blackstone in 1985, starting with just $400,000. They invented a firm name that melded their own names. (Schwarz is German for “black,” while Peterson comes from the Greek for “stone.”) The initial en­terprise included merger advice, which was Schwarzman’s specialty at Lehman, and the nascent business of leveraged buyouts.

Schwarzman, now ranked 88th among the world’s richest people (worth $13 billion, ac­cording to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index), at that time was in pure entrepreneur mode, cribbing resources where he could. He used corporate libraries at friends’ investment banks, including First Boston, where his pals Bruce Wasserstein and Joseph Perella worked. During his visits, he got to know a young employee named Larry Fink. When Fink left First Boston in 1988, Schwarzman and Peterson staked him and Schlosstein with $5 million to start a fund management shop at Blackstone. In Schwarzman’s telling, their business plan was written out on a roll of toilet paper. (BlackRock says it was a roll of paper from an easel.)

Schwarzman grew up in Philadelphia and showed an ambitious streak early. When he was 15, he told his father, who owned a house­wares store, that he should expand his busi­ness into a national chain. His father rejected the idea, saying he was happy and had all the money he needed. His son couldn’t under­stand such thinking. Fink was raised in Van Nuys, California, the son of a shoe salesman and an English professor. His drive was in ev­idence by the mid-1980s, when he was one of the pioneers of mortgage-backed securities. Just after his 33rd birthday, he made $100 million one quarter as a trader and lost more than $100 million the next—a formative ex­perience and an episode that led to his even­tual departure from First Boston.

Fink, who has a professorial demeanor, and Schwarzman, who is more bombas­tic, worked together for about five years. What became known as BlackRock Finan­cial thrived from its earliest days and never raised additional money. But by 1994, with $23 billion in assets under management, a split was developing over how to grow the business. The Blackstone principals’ stake in BlackRock had already dwindled to 35 percent from 50 percent as Fink offered equity to attract employees. Schwarzman thought that was enough, but Fink wanted to give away more. In the end, they agreed to sell the BlackRock business to PNC Bank for $240 million. (PNC later spun BlackRock off and remains its biggest shareholder.)

“It was a very bitter divorce. But I don’t regret it,” Fink said in a 2011 interview with the New York Times. “I’m larger,” he added, a boast about his assets under management. (While Fink and Schwarzman say they pay little attention to each other’s business, ex­ecutives at both firms can rattle off accurate, up-to-date comparisons of assets, earnings, market value, and other metrics.) Fink and Schwarzman have reconciled, Fink told the Times. “I’ve never heard from any source in the world anything but praise from Steve about who I am and what BlackRock is.”

Indeed, Schwarzman says of Fink, “I have enormous admiration for him.” And he told Bloomberg in 2013 that letting BlackRock go was a “heroic mistake.” And yet people who know both men say their outsize personal­ities probably made it inevitable that they couldn’t coexist in a single organization.

So Schwarzman and Fink are not friends today, but they are friendly and bump into each other often enough on the financial statesman circuit. Politicians woo both men for counsel—and campaign contributions.
On a typical day recently, Schwarzman met with Jeb Bush, the former Florida gov­ernor and Republican presidential hope­ful. After he walked Bush out, Schwarzman sat for an hourlong interview for this story. Then he was out of his offices and into a black car to go to lunch with New York’s Democratic mayor, Bill de Blasio.

Schwarzman has played a political nego­tiator role at times. At the height of the 2012 showdown between the Obama administra­tion and the U.S. Congress over the so-called fiscal cliff, he was a go-between for the White House and Eric Cantor, then the majority leader in the House of Representatives.

“The taxpayers were getting a great bar­gain—the dealmaker of the century trying to cut a deal for the president,” says Cantor, who became a vice chairman at the invest­ment bank Moelis & Co. after losing his con­gressional seat. He says he took half a dozen phone calls from Schwarzman during the fis­cal cliff standoff, which ended with compro­mise legislation at the last moment. Cantor remains in contact with Schwarzman, and he and Schwarzman both attended an off-the-record executive summit in March that helped inform Fink’s CEO letter.

Fink’s public role has a different em­phasis than Schwarzman’s. With his fixed-income background and massive number of clients, Fink weighs in on monetary mea­sures and financial stability issues. During the 2008 financial crisis, he spoke regu­larly to U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner. When the euro zone was teetering a few years later, BlackRock was an adviser to the governments of Ger­many, Greece, and Ireland, among others.

“There’s a need for a voice for savers,” he said in a 2012 interview he did for consulting firm McKinsey & Co. He’s also defended the disaffected little guy at times. When Occupy Wall Street protesters were commanding at­tention in 2011, Fink said that he understood why they spoke out against financial firms.

Fink’s letter in April decrying short-term thinking prompted a wide-ranging public discussion—and criticism from activists. Carl Icahn said Fink’s position emboldens underperforming CEOs. “A lot of them feel like they can do what they want because of guys like Larry Fink,” Icahn said in an inter­view. As much as Icahn has clout when he invests in a target stock, BlackRock probably has more. The firm votes about 15,000 prox­ies a year and is often the biggest holder of shares of a given company.

Fink and Schwarzman share the global stage mostly without signs of friction. But in one area, the success of his former partner rankles Schwarzman: market cap. Despite Blackstone’s greater operating profit, Black­Rock gets a higher valuation. The gap is about $11 billion lately. Investors give BlackRock a higher price-earnings mul­tiple on the idea that the traditional money manager’s earnings are safer and steadier.

Schwarzman complains about this when­ever he has the chance. “People have some fear that if we sell things, we will never in­vest in anything ever again that will make money,” he said in May on Bloomberg televi­sion. His 30-year track record should dispel such concerns, he said. Blackstone has been catching up with BlackRock of late, which may give Schwarzman solace—or encourage him to keep talking about the matter. Black­stone shares have climbed almost three times as fast as BlackRock’s in the past two years.

“The holy grail for the private equity firms is how do they get the big, long-only manager multiple,” Lee said. For Schwarzman, reaching that loftier val­uation might be one way to get over his re­grets about having lost BlackRock—and Fink—all those years ago.
blackrock can actually buy a lot of countries with their aum or collapse any market with it. can't imagine how a company can generate so much
The stone comes first before the rock.
These companies are no doubt bloodsuckers. Just think logically, do we even have 1 trillion population?

Even if every person on earth give them $1, they only have $7.4 billion. It takes 1 person to give them around $700 to reach $5.1T and it is still growing.

How can someone have so much money?

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)